In class on Wednesday we discussed Section
2 Reading E, "The Ethics of Genetic Research on Sexual Orientation"
by Schuklenk, Stein, Kerin and Byne. This was a very interesting discussion because
it was centered on the possible existence of a gay gene that could be
scientifically tested for. I searched
online for any articles pertaining to the topic and I found one from http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=87
, that featured a position paper they wrote on genetics determining ones
sexuality. A quote written at the end really stood out to me because it pretty
much summed up my view of this issue. It stated “The scientific argument for a
biological basis for sexual orientation remains weak. The political argument
that it will bolster gay pride or prevent homophobic bigotry runs counter to
experience. The lesbian, gay, and bisexual community does not need to have its
"deviance" tolerated because its members were born "that
way" and "cannot help it." Rather, society must recognize the
validity of lesbian and gay lifestyles. We need an end to discrimination, an
acceptance of all human beings, and a celebration of diversity, whatever its
origins.” I feel as though the point of even attempting to search for a gay
gene is ridiculous. Even if one could be found what would it solve? Can two
straight parents carry the gay gene that they were born with but were just
never active, and then pass it on to their child? And if the “gay” gene is
active in their child there gay and if its not their straight? It just seems
too farfetched and unnecessary for me to believe or even agree with. I feel
like ones preference when it comes to sexual orientation is too complex to pin
on a gene. I think it definitely comes more from ones surrounding’s, personal feelings
and experiences. Overall even the proposal of testing for a gay gene in my
opinion is nothing but an inclination of society’s unwillingness to fully accept
gay lifestyles.
No comments:
Post a Comment